<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selecting an affiliate network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network/%20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=selecting-an-affiliate-network</link>
	<description>My thoughts about affiliate marketing and online in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network//comment-page-1#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mabailey.co.uk/?p=322#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Whilst money issues are important, i&#039;d say the single most infuriating factor from networks is a lack of timely and informative responses when there are problems with programs, payments, and just about anything else that can go wrong.
The affiliate game is one which relies on a fair amount of trust - dealing with people you are unlikely to ever meet, trusting tracking systems etc, and most affiliates aren&#039;t stupid - &quot;we&#039;ll look into it and get back to you ASAP&quot; usually followed up a day or two later with some kind of formulaic excuse (if at all) doesn&#039;t wash. I certainly appreciate that things can often go wrong, but also appreciate it when that is acknowledged by the network, and i am being told all the details and how it&#039;s going to be resolved, rather than being ignored until the problem is sorted out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst money issues are important, i&#8217;d say the single most infuriating factor from networks is a lack of timely and informative responses when there are problems with programs, payments, and just about anything else that can go wrong.<br />
The affiliate game is one which relies on a fair amount of trust &#8211; dealing with people you are unlikely to ever meet, trusting tracking systems etc, and most affiliates aren&#8217;t stupid &#8211; &#8220;we&#8217;ll look into it and get back to you ASAP&#8221; usually followed up a day or two later with some kind of formulaic excuse (if at all) doesn&#8217;t wash. I certainly appreciate that things can often go wrong, but also appreciate it when that is acknowledged by the network, and i am being told all the details and how it&#8217;s going to be resolved, rather than being ignored until the problem is sorted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network//comment-page-1#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mabailey.co.uk/?p=322#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Matt, 
There is an exposure to bad debt in this case but that&#039;s my job to manage that.  If I don&#039;t get it right I get sacked, its as simple as that!  
There is no better stick to beat merchants with than to threaten closure of a programme due to none payment and explain to affiliates WHY.  The trust affiliates have in that merchant will be gone for a long time and so cheques that were &quot;stuck in the system&quot; miraculously get released.
Our view has always been that affiliates can trust us and that trust is worth its weight in gold and so we try our level best not to let anyone down.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
There is an exposure to bad debt in this case but that&#8217;s my job to manage that.  If I don&#8217;t get it right I get sacked, its as simple as that!<br />
There is no better stick to beat merchants with than to threaten closure of a programme due to none payment and explain to affiliates WHY.  The trust affiliates have in that merchant will be gone for a long time and so cheques that were &#8220;stuck in the system&#8221; miraculously get released.<br />
Our view has always been that affiliates can trust us and that trust is worth its weight in gold and so we try our level best not to let anyone down.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network//comment-page-1#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mabailey.co.uk/?p=322#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

Great points and I know that buy.at have always been very proactive in addressing innovative ways to ensure that affiliates get paid when they want and how they want. However, does this approach not leave you exposed if a large merchant were to go bust? Appreciate it&#039;s a problem that all networks face and it&#039;s interesting to see how the different networks approach it. I feel a separate blog post coming up.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>Great points and I know that buy.at have always been very proactive in addressing innovative ways to ensure that affiliates get paid when they want and how they want. However, does this approach not leave you exposed if a large merchant were to go bust? Appreciate it&#8217;s a problem that all networks face and it&#8217;s interesting to see how the different networks approach it. I feel a separate blog post coming up.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.mabailey.co.uk/selecting-an-affiliate-network//comment-page-1#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mabailey.co.uk/?p=322#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Matt, 

Here at buy.at we took the decision that we would stick with one payment run per month but give assurances to our affiliates that the payment would be made even if we are having problems with collecting the cash from the merchant.

We see that debt collection is our job, not something that affiliates should be concerned about.   I guess its horses for courses....do you want the chance to be paid two weeks earlier possibly or once per month, on time for certain?

Regards

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, </p>
<p>Here at buy.at we took the decision that we would stick with one payment run per month but give assurances to our affiliates that the payment would be made even if we are having problems with collecting the cash from the merchant.</p>
<p>We see that debt collection is our job, not something that affiliates should be concerned about.   I guess its horses for courses&#8230;.do you want the chance to be paid two weeks earlier possibly or once per month, on time for certain?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
