Matt Bailey's affiliate blog

19 Jun, 2009

Platform A Speakeasy follow up

Posted by: admin In: Uncategorized

I blogged a few days ago about how I had been asked to speak on a panel at the above event and thought i’d follow up with a few thoughts about the event.

First of all I thought it was incredibly well organised and congratulations to Lizzie and the rest of the team for all the hard work. Whilst there is still often the perception that affiliate marketing is a bit of a cottage industry, events such as this go a long way to improving the image and demonstrating the professionalism that is needed to take things forward.

The keynote speaker was Lord Digby Jones who was a very strong speaker. John Maher from O2 asked a very good question about what Lord Digby’s advice would be for SME owners and I thought his answer was spot on. If people don’t pay you on time then stop working with them. Food for thought for affiliates and networks…

Mainly I wanted to talk about the panel session that I was on, chaired by Warrick Lambert from Platform A. Alongside me on the panel was Pete Wakim from Quidco, Chris Morling from Dotzinc and Alicia Navarro from Skimlinks. My main frustration about the session was that we didn’t have enough time to discuss all of the issues we had planned.

speakeasy matt bailey

We covered questions around what niches affiliates can/should promote, whether affiliates should be paid on a lifetime revenue share basis and the question of last click attribution. There was some very good debate both on the panel and amongst the audience.

It seems there is desire amongst affiliates to understand more about these areas and I for one would welcome increased debate. If anyone wants to add any questions in the comments below I’d be more than happy to try and talk about these issues further in future blog posts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

1 Response to "Platform A Speakeasy follow up"

1 | Helen

June 19th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

Avatar

Interesting that the conversation of last click attribution is being discussed a lot more lately. This is something I am personally very interested in and have looked at closely within the affiliate channel.

The barrier as I see it is that most clients can not see the full path to sale easily across all channels including affiliate, PPC, email, display etc. In many cases the channels are still managed in silos with different tracking techniques for each, making it very difficult to have a view of what happens in the path to sale.

I really do believe that the affiliate model has to move to an attribution model at some point. The danger I see if not is that the last click will be even more fiercely contested and we will begin to lose the affiliates further down the chain who are adding significant value to the customer journey.

In a contribution model there will be winners and losers but I think it is important to understand how customers reach a purchase decision. I would be concerned that if affiliates are forced out of the market then the value is not being added earlier on in the chain, and therefore will the customer reach that last website anyway – in this case everyone would lose out.

I expect there will be much more discussion around this topic to come and sounds like it was an interesting debate

Comment Form




About

Always happy to have a chat with people about anything that is written here. Follow me on twitter - www.twitter.com/mattb811