Matt Bailey's affiliate blog

11 Feb, 2009

eConsultancy Affiliate Census – key learnings

Posted by: admin In: Affiliate

After writing mainly about things that puzzled me about the survey, I will now write a far more constructive post about the key learnings that we can take from it.

The most interesting point as far as I’m is the question about the reward model. 36% of affiliates believe that commission should be split in some way, higher than the 34% that believe last click should win. I am glad that affiliates appreciate the arguments about rewarding based on value. However, as I keep arguing, you cannot attribute based purely on the affiliate channel, as there is clear crossover with PPC, SEO, display etc. You need to take all of these channels into account when looking to understand each parties contribution top the sale.

I think the network section needs to looked at by all of the networks. There seems to be a growing feeling amongst affiliates that networks need to be more visible in their dedication to protecting the future of the industry, even if that means taking a hit on revenue. All of us working in affiliate marketing obviously have a vested interest in making sure that merchants continue to invest money in the channel and I do think that networks need to be more proactive in this area.

There also seems to be a greater requirement from affiliates for increased communication from networks, agencies and merchants which I think is really encouraging. The fact that affiliates are seeking to find out more about merchants instead of just flinging up a few banners randomly is great, and merchants should look at ways to produce more ways to assist affiliates to produce good quality content.

Backing this claim up is the data on why affiliates don’t promote a merchant once signed up for it. Lack of links, slow acceptance, lack of information provided and people not getting round to it are the main reasons. As a merchant I would be looking at this and thinking that I could convert 75% of affiliates who sign up but never promote me quite easily. Make sure affiliates can deeplink to where they want to, pester them to get round to it and ask what they need to help them, approve them quickly and provide them with the information they need. If you have 50 dormant affiliates on your campaign, think about the amount of sales that 38 of them could be doing for you right now.

The section about working directly with merchants is also insightful. The majority of affiliates dealing direct do so because either they have no option or because they get paid more. It seems that a huge majority of affiliates would prefer to work through networks because it reduces time and increases security. Therefore the message seems to be that if you are going to run an in-house affiliate scheme you have to do it bloody well to tempt the affiliates over, as well as being a big, stable company in whom the affiliates have trust.

It is positive to see that 55% of affiliates see the “current economic crisis” as an opportunity. I am a bit more sceptical on this one. Merchants are reducing their advertising budgets and will tend to prioritise in the areas that deliver the lowest acquisition cost, which tends to be search. I completely appreciate the arguments around affiliate being pay per performance and therefore essentially risk free. However, in larger companies they will be assigned a budget for online marketing and have to split that between their channels. A lack of understanding of the affiliate channel, or a larger share of voice from the search agency will see this budget being assigned to channels other than affiliate. This is of course not true for all merchants, but I fear many affiliate networks will be in a position where their job will be to manage budget rather than attempt to grow a campaign over the next year or so.

The fact that 44% of people believe the Google’s entry will be a threat surprises me. Personally I think this will be a really positive move, dependant on how the Big G play it. I think it will give increased respectability to the affiliate sector and bring more genuine content affiliates into the channel, thereby increasing the amount of spend and knowledge merchants have. I think the most sensible thing Google could do is start persuading all of those site owners with AdSense on their sites to change them for more compelling affiliate adverts being paid on a CPA basis, but I’m sure they have their own plans!

Interested to hear others views on the census.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

2 Responses to "eConsultancy Affiliate Census – key learnings"

1 | Kevin Edwards

February 11th, 2009 at 9:43 pm

Avatar

Hi Matt,

Interesting to see what you have to say about networks having to be more innovative.

Inevitably some networks are more innovative than others but I actually think much industry innovation comes from networks and knowing what future plans we have in place that looks set to continue. There is still the perception that networks carry this responsibility and I don’t see any harm in this.

Now don’t take this as a deliberate dig (as if I would), but I actually think one part of the affiliate chain that needs to work harder is the agency link. For too long big agencies have shown a lack of sophistication when approaching affiliate marketing.

Fortunately that’s changing but I’d like to see agencies being far more proactive. No agency has offered to stump up a sum of cash for the forthcoming affiliate drinks and apart from dedicated affiliate companies no other digital agencies chose to exhibit at the Expo last year.

With regards your point about the current economic climate I think there’s a general sense of complaceny that because we’re a payment on performance channel we’re least exposed. As you mention this is reliant on companies understanding the channel. I’ve also never liked the idea that we’re a ‘risk free’ channel. To brands that don’t care about how they’re promoted, the quality of their traffic and opening themselves up to the less savoury aspects of affiliate marketing then yes, it’s a ‘risk free’ channel.

Overall it’s an encouraging report I think and provides us with very useful pointers that show we’re focusing on the right priorities for future improvements.

2 | admin

February 12th, 2009 at 9:13 am

Avatar

Hi Kev,

Thanks for your comment but I don’t think I did say anything about networks having to be more innovative. I agree that agencies need to be more proactive and I think that the increased scrutiny brought on by the recession will lead to all parties involved having to justify what they do more. This should separate the wheat from the chaff a little more.

With regards to sponsorship and exhibiting, I can only speak from our point of view. Traditionally we have looked to take on clients with a view to managing their entire online marketing requirements rather than purely the affiliate offering. Therefore the decision was taken that the kind of people we would need to talk to, ie marketing director level, are not the type of people who attend the A4U Expo. Our offering is changing so that decision will be reviewed this year.

Agree that it is a really useful survey with some good pointers and I think we are all generally looking to head in the same direction.

Comment Form




About

Always happy to have a chat with people about anything that is written here. Follow me on twitter - www.twitter.com/mattb811